Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Judicial System Frauds’ Category

Susan Lindauer was a major CIA asset leading up to the 9/11 attacks. She was the main person in charge of communicating back-channel relations between Iraq and the U.S. Because she had inside knowledge that the U.S. knew for months in advance that the 9/11 attack was coming, the U.S. government had her detained under the Patriot Act and imprisoned in a military facility for a year. And then she remained under legal indictment for five years. She was apparently very close to having her brain scrambled via drugs by the government. Hers is a tragic and harrowing story, but her story proves beyond doubt, that corruption exists at the highest levels of the U.S. government. She is a real American Hero.

See this interview with former CIA intelligence asset Susan Lindauer.

And this followup interview: Former CIA Asset Susan Lindauer on naysayers, her post 9/11 story, the Patriot Act, NDAA, and more.

(The text below was taken from the followup interview above, as located on the ActivistPost.com website. Thanks!)

Back in September, we spoke to former CIA asset Susan Lindauer (here and here), in an interview that generated a lot of discussion online. Ms. Lindauer’s story, which completely counteracts the idea that there was no specific intelligence regarding the 9/11 attacks in advance, was received extremely positively by the majority of our audience.

With some message board chatter centering around questions of credibility, we decided to give her the opportunity to set the record straight on her CIA involvement and, in particular, a character assassination piece from the New York Times in April 2004. Susan also picks up her story from where she left off last time, and touches on the Patriot Act and the NDAA 2012.

Read Full Post »

The following video is an excellent introduction into the deeper truth that lies behind the New World Order (NWO). I find it encouraging that it is Alex Jones interviewing David Icke. David Icke has, to his great credit in my estimation, exposed the Israeli connection in relationship to this NWO. There aren’t many folks that are pursuing this Israeli connection because they generally get savagely attacked by pro-Zionist organizations like AIPAC (The American Israel Public Affairs Committee), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Jewish Defense League (JDL), etc.

I have previously criticized Alex Jones for ignoring the Israeli connection to the NWO and the U.S. government, but in this show he acknowledges these facts as presented by David Icke. He does seem to go out of his way at the beginning of the program to say that he doesn’t know what David Icke is going to talk about, as if to somehow excuse his involvement in interviewing David Icke. Nonetheless, he seems to fully agree and acknowledge what Icke has to say regarding the Zionist Israeli issue. So I have to give him credit here for that.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AA83OmAUrZM

Read Full Post »

Copyright Trolls

When the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) declared an end to its litigation campaign against music fans who used peer-to-peer technology to share music many people thought that would be the end of mass copyright litigation — after all hadn’t the RIAA demonstrated that suing customers was no way to improve the bottom line?

Apparently not everyone got the memo. In the past year at least three groups have begun to experiment with using mass copyright litigation to extract settlements from individuals. These copyright trolls try to grow businesses out of suing Internet users — their tactics include targeting large groups of anonymous “Doe defendants” to improperly minimize their court costs and exploiting the massive damages in copyright law in order to pressure defendants into settling quickly.

EFF is working hard to help victims get access to the resources they need to defend their rights call the court’s attention to trolls’ disrespect for due process and educate the public about the harms of copyright trolling.

U.S. Copyright Group

Have you been targeted by a USCG subpoena? Learn more about the claims made against you, explore possible defenses, and try to find legal counsel.

The U.S. Copyright Group (USCG) approaches independent film producers and offers to collect money from people who are illegally downloading their movies on BitTorrent. USCG currently represents the producers of several films including The Hurt Locker and Far Cry. USCG then files predatory lawsuits implicating thousands of unnamed John Does, subpoenas their identities from the ISP’s, and then sues the individuals themselves. Once the user’s identity is known USCG threatens a judgment of up to $150,000 per downloaded movie — the maximum penalty allowable by law in copyright suits and a very unlikely judgment in cases arising from a single noncommercial infringement — in order to pressure the alleged infringers to settle quickly for $1,500 to $2,500 per person. The judge in two of USCG’s cases has dismissed many of the defendants though thousands more remain.

Righthaven

If you are the target for a Righthaven lawsuit in need of representation please contact info@eff.org. Please understand that we have a relatively small number of very hard-working attorneys so we do not have the resources to defend everyone who asks no matter how deserving. However, if we cannot represent you directly we will make every effort to put you in touch with attorneys who can.

Righthaven LLC has brought over a hundred lawsuits in a Nevada federal court claiming copyright infringement. They find cases by searching the Internet for parts of newspaper stories posted online by individuals nonprofits political organizations and others; buying the copyright to that newspaper story; and then suing the operator of the website for copyright infringement. Like the U.S. Copyright Group, Righthaven relies on the threat of copyright liability (and, in a unique twist, an entirely bogus threat of loss of the target’s domain name) to scare the posters into a quick settlement. Reported settlements have fallen between $2,000 and $3,000.

Porn Downloading Lawsuits

In these cases the owners of the adult movies filed mass lawsuits based on single counts of copyright infringement stemming from the downloading of a pornographic film and improperly lumped hundreds of defendants together regardless of where the IP addresses indicate the defendants live. To date over 50,000 Does have been targeted in cases filed in West Virginia, Texas, Illinois, and the Northern District of California. The motivation behind these cases appears to be to leverage the risk of embarrassment associated with pornography to coerce settlement payments despite serious problems with the underlying claims. The judge in several of the cases filed in West Virginia has blocked plaintiffs from proceeding against almost all of the defendants in those cases — approximately 5,400 people. Unfortunately, thousands of defendants in other cases are still under threat.

Read Full Post »

(The article below was taken from the Infowars.net website. Thanks!)

Note: You can now watch America: From Freedom To Fascism for free on YouTube.

Russo Film Exposes Criminal Banking Syndicate That Rules America

Steve Watson & Alex Jones / Infowars.net | October 25 2006

Click here to order America: Freedom to Fascism now. See below for the trailer.

In 1913 America was a free country. Then a band of powerful bankers achieved their fathers’ and great grandfathers’ goal. America has never been the same. Soon the world will not be the same.

Aaron Russo expertly exposes the traitorous Federal Reserve Act and the fact that there is no law that stipulates American citizens have to pay income taxes. The ratification of the 16th amendment, also known as the “Tax amendment”, represents a fundamental undermining of Constitutional law in America. It is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated against the American people by the elite private banking institutions that have usurped government as an arm of their overall control mechanism.

Russo presents interviews with an impressive range of government officials, IRS special agents , FBI officers, Politicians and tax attorneys who have researched and subsequently campaigned against the Federal Reserve Act and thus reveals why the IRS is an illegal foundation.

The income tax does not meet either criteria of Constitutionally legal taxation in America, that is direct apportioned tax or indirect uniform tax. The IRS claims that the 16th Amendment allowed for a third form of taxation, however, the Supreme court ruling on the amendment states that it allows for no new forms of taxation. More supreme court cases in the same period confirm the same conclusion. The 16th Amendment did not allow the Federal Government to levy a new tax, thus there is no Constitutional basis for the income tax.

The findings of the Grace Commission, a Blue-Ribbon panel appointed by President Ronald Reagan found that:

“One hundred percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal debt. All individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government.”

Education, health and community up keep is paid for out of state and local property taxes, gas taxes, liquor taxes, you name it. Proceeds from the income tax do not pay for these things.The income tax money goes to pay for defense and the expansion of corporate America. In essence everyday American people are funding expansionist wars and the playboy lifestyle of the financial institutions that then further profit from that activity and become ever more powerful.

The income tax is the tool of totalitarianism. It is the means by which the corporate controlled government manipulates the people on a mass scale and locks them into servitude. If the people do not know what their rights are then an agency that knowingly breaks the law is not going to tell them.

The banks now control America. They print the currency and tell the people what it’s worth. They have the legal right to counterfeit money. This coup d’etat of benign open and accountable government by elitist private interest represents the tipping point from freedom and the long slide towards fascism. Since the government’s primary goal stopped being the welfare of the people it has ceased to exist as a legal entity.

This is exactly what Thomas Jefferson warned the American people may happen. Jefferson said:

“If the American people ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency…the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property, until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Russo, the award winning filmmaker who produced “The Rose” and “Trading Places”, confronts the IRS in Washington and is quickly reprimanded by Homeland Security. He discovers that those who have stood up to the income tax slave system and simply asked the question “where is the law?” have been slandered and personally attacked because to reduce the issue to a rational debate would immediately expose the truth behind the entire scam.

Russo discovers that this has not come about by accident it is a planned and coordinated agenda. The younger generations have no concept that they have been drawn into a trap from which they cannot escape. The middle class is being systematically and purposefully wiped out, leaving behind a population on the brink of serfdom. The purchasing power of the dollar has been destroyed BY DESIGN, leaving behind a cost of living only affordable to those who profit from the system.

New laws passed through Congress seek to further enslave people by making it harder to declare bankruptcy while at the same time allowing the banks to charge huge amounts of interest. thus both parties, working with the banks, legally enslave the nation.

The people of America are being fed upon by the elite and devoured alive and they barely even recognize it. It is the perfect crime, the pinnacle of criminal capitalism

It is with this in mind that Russo delves deep into the big brother control agenda and places it succinctly within the context it needs to be understood in. What is being sold to the American people today as patriotism is fascism, and it is part of the same overall agenda to rape the people financially, spiritually and mentally. This is the only place to go to get more out of America. If you can literally control the movements people make and the actions they take then you own their world.

You need to see this film now. In one hour and forty nine minutes Aaron Russo spells out what is at stake and what happened when the American people stopped questioning and started trusting their government.

Read Full Post »

(This article was taken from Amber Lyon’s blog. Thanks!)

President Obama Has Turned Journalists into Criminals

  • Posted on October 16, 2012

Will tonight’s presidential debate moderator have the balls to address this crucial issue?

If by “change” President Obama meant criminalizing journalism in the United States, then he’s succeeded.

Why should you care?  The investigative journalism that Obama has silenced could have exposed more corruption in the U.S. government, military, banking industry; corruption that has caused anguish to numerous Americans.  The reports that will never be heard, read, or seen on TV may have led to positive change.

The Obama administration is suffocating investigative journalism at an alarming rate through the abuse of the Espionage Act of 1917, an act more prone to be used to protect government secrecy than national security.  Before Obama, the act had been used only three times total since 1917.  The current administration has used it six times to go after whistleblowers and the journalists who protect and reveal their information.

President Obama was bold enough to use the Espionage Act to  subpoena New York Times journalist James Risen in an attempt to force him to ‘give up’ information on a CIA whistleblower.  Risen accused the administration of trying to silence journalists and refused to acquiesce stating,

“Can you have a democracy without aggressive investigative journalism? I don’t believe you can, and that’s why I’m fighting.”

Risen predicted Obama’s attack against him would have an unprecedented chilling effect on mainstream investigative journalism in the US.  He was right.

I was on the brunt end of the Obama-generated censorship while employed at CNN as an investigative correspondent.

On at least a weekly basis, and to my constant frustration, my superiors and CNN’s lawyers were quick to remind me that we need to be extra careful because “President Obama has gone after more journalists and whistleblowers than any president in history”.  The leash around my neck began to tighten.

Whether I was allowed to embark on future stories or even interview sensitive sources for potential investigations, eventually became an ‘Obama subpoena risk assessment’ and potential court cost calculation, rather than a pure evaluation of the report’s contribution to public good or our journalistic duty to cover the story.

Some of my most crucial investigations were killed before they started because they were too high a risk of an Obama subpoena.

One boss told me quote “we know how the FBI feels about your source, if we have information the FBI will want we become a target”.

David Carr of The New York Times noted Obama’s war on journalism may have more to do with secrecy than national security and is harming press freedom in the U.S.:

As journalists we vow never to reveal our confidential sources, so to this administration we are criminals.  It’s time President Obama focused his time hunting down the real law breakers rather than attacking the messengers.

For more information please check out these articles:

Huffington Post: Obama’s War on Journalism 

NY Times: Blurred Line Between Espionage and Truth

Salon.com : Obama Targets Journalists 

Read Full Post »

This is an excellent example of how the government, or in this case, a corporation, can seriously fuck with your life without any good (reasonable) legal premise to do so. If you have comparatively unlimited resources, like government and large corporations do as compared to the average person, you can seriously damage a person’s work life, reputation, finances, family, etc. practically at will. They may not ultimately win the case, but they’ve essentially destroyed the person’s life in the meantime. And perhaps more importantly, they’ve sent a chilling message to anyone else that dares to blow the whistle on the government or a corporation.

This is judicial system fraud perpetrated by elite arrogant pricks that are essentially above the law because they have money. There is no way to stop it because it is built into our legal system. In other words, this is legal fraud. The elite have spent, and continue to spend, lots of money in the effort of writing laws and protecting laws ensuring they have and keep this option with impunity.

And where is the mainstream press when it comes to cases like this? The press should be putting things like this on the front page, pounding on it until resolved. But generally, if they talk about it at all, they’ll present the story in a way that’s ultimately twisted towards the side of the corporation or government. In other words, since the press is largely controlled by the government and corporations, they run away with their tail between their legs rather than stand up for what is right and fair and just. Cowards. But to be fair, because of their bosses, they don’t have much of a choice unless someone is willing to give up their career to stand up and fight. Even then, it’s generally just a little flair-up int the news that also gets twisted by mainstream media, and/or is quickly forgotten, ignored and buried.

(The article below was taken from the ActivistPost.com website. Thanks!)

Years in Jail for Exposing A Corporate Mistake?

Luke Rudkowski got a chance to meet and interview well-known hacker, Andrew Auernheimer, also known by his pseudonym, Weev. Weev was recently convicted for two felonies and currently is free on bail until sentencing, The court convicted him on one count of identity fraud and one count of conspiracy to access a computer without authorization. In this interview Weez explains what lead to these charges and how he is dealing with the situation.

View the YouTube Video. To find out more about Weev check out his website: http://freeweev.info/

(The following article was taken from the freeweev.info site. Thanks!)

I know this guy, “weev”. Real name: Andrew Auernheimer. He is almost always offensive. He constantly says things that brutally offend my liberal sensibilities. He never takes anything seriously and generally treats life as a piece of performance art. He’s undisciplined and lazy. I can’t believe I count him amongst my acquaintances, but he’s very charming and funny at a dinner party. That doesn’t really change how gigantic of a jackass he is. As the world’s most notorious Internet troll, his ability to repulse is quite high.

Unfortunately, it has become essential to our first amendment freedoms to keep this jackass troll out of jail.

In June of 2010, there was a public AT&T webserver that was publishing iPad 3G user email addresses. When I say “publishing”, I mean it. This thing had no password, no firewall, no authorization mechanism stopping any member of the public from collecting this data. One man, Daniel Spitler, collected a sample of this data. He brought it to Andrew Auernheimer. Andrew gave it to a journalist because he feels that when a big company puts you at risk, you deserve to know about it and the company responsible deserves to be held to account and publicly shamed.

As his reward for performing a public service, Andrew is now facing two consecutive 5-year felonies. No good deed goes unpunished.

Much more worrisome than the injustice that Andrew is receiving is the precedent it creates against us. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, or CFAA, isn’t just a criminal statute, it is civil. Andrew’s co-defendant accessed a publicly available webserver and Andrew gave the data to a single journalist. This means that any time you visit a URL if the web operator later decides they just don’t like you, you may face prison.

You may also just get sued by a gigantic company with more resources than you.

 THE CHARGES

Andrew is indicted on two charges, USC 1030 “Conspiracy to access a computer device without authorization” in furtherance of a violation of a New Jersey state statute. The New Jersey state statute includes the language “discloses”, which means the federal government is saying that the very act of giving something to a journalist to inform the public is a criminal act. This represents an extremely dangerous prior restraint upon free speech. Beyond that, if you run any sort of business that touches the Internet at all, you should be concerned about the language behind USC 1030. If you query an API that a company makes public as part of their web app, and later they decide that your technology is too disruptive or you provide competition to a feature they’re planning, they can have you imprisoned or sued.

Andrew is also charged with USC 1028, “identity theft”, for possessing a list of email addresses. The statute is so broad that it criminalizes possessing home addresses, which means you’re a criminal every time you walk down the block of a suburb and look at house numbers.

“He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” – Thomas Paine, Dissertation on First Principles of Government

Regardless of what you think of Andrew’s identity, associations or politics, you must understand the urgency of helping fight the case against him. The interpretation the justice department is putting forward in this case affects everyone that opens a web browser, writes a web app that references external APIs or talks to a journalist about any externally acquired data. This case reeks of dangerous prior restraint upon free speech, and a guilty verdict that sticks will harm the free and open internet as badly as SOPA/PIPA would have.

Legal defense costs money. Federal criminal defense generally takes a hundred thousand dollars. By helping Andrew you safeguard your own liberties from the assault of a tyrannical government. Andrew needs a large amount of money. Please consider giving a donation or a loan.

Read Full Post »

(This article was taken from the globalresearch.ca website. Thanks!)

Obama has Prosecuted More Whistleblowers than All Other Presidents COMBINED. But Refuses to Go After White Collar Criminals

Global Research, April 22, 2012
Washington’s Blog 22 April 2012
Region:

… But Refuses to Go After White Collar Criminals

Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton each prosecuted financial crime more aggressively than Barack Obama.

But that doesn’t mean that Obama is failing to prosecute. He is just aiming at a different type of target.

The New York Times reported last year:

In President Obama’s 26 months in office, civilian and military prosecutors have charged five people in cases involving leaking information, more than all previous presidents combined.

Andrew Kreig notes:

[Government Accountability Project’s] Homeland Security and Human Rights Director Jesselyn Radack, a well-credential ethics advisor in 2001 at the Bush Department of Justice [said] “Obama … has brought more prosecutions against whistleblowers under the Espionage Act than any previous president and all presidents combined.”

The former head of the National Security Agency’s global digital data gathering program – William Binney – confirmed to Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman:

AMY GOODMAN: [T]he number of people who have been indicted are more than all presidents combined in the past.

WILLIAM BINNEY: Right. And I think it’s to silence what’s going on.

And see this interview with former CIA intelligence asset Susan Lindauer.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

JONATHAN TURLEY

Res ipsa loquitur ("The thing itself speaks")

Amber Lyon

"Well-behaved women seldom make history..."

Writings of J. Todd Ring

Independent Research and Analysis, Essays in Politics and Philosophy.

________________Child Health Safety_________________

The facts about vaccine safety your government won't give you